| ??? 08/06/06 11:09 Read: times |
#121724 - spot the difference |
i always thought that c compilers would automagicaly select the correct datatype for something like :- for(i=0;i<blah;++i)....
so why have I got c code which someone else has written which has for( unsigned int i=0;i<blah;++i)..... the unsigned int seems redundant,maybe I am wrong,i usualy am. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| spot the difference | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| C++ magic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| so, who's got a C++ for 805x? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| wrangling the architecture to do something it was | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| more shome sort of mishtake | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not sure about that | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| C++ and C99 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| IAR has C++ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
new sdcc c99 switches | 01/01/70 00:00 |