| ??? 05/11/06 12:23 Read: times | #115983 - not a tantalum pi Responding to: ???'s previous message | 
| Anyway, in your application I would always use a pi-filter at the input of your circuit instead of a simple decoupling cap (even if some caps are paralleled). Because this will heavily enhance the noise filtering performance and provide sufficient inrush current
 stating the often overlooked obvious: do not use a tantal at the input to the pi filter, I just use a 100nF at that place. Erik | 
| Topic | Author | Date | 
| Tantalum on power supply filter - Blowup | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| does it get (luke)warm ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Nope | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Symbol is marking the "+"-pole! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Verified | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Surge current | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Some interesting reading | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Much thanks! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Pardon the pun.... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Tantals aren't unreliable! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not a tantalum pi | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| pi-filters   | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Guilty | 01/01/70 00:00 | 



