| ??? 05/03/06 15:41 Read: times |
#115480 - Pseudo Instruction? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Isn't a Pseudo Instruction different from a Directive?
eg, Keil has a "JMP" pseudo instruction that may generate an AJMP or LJMP opcode as appropriate. Thus such a pseudo instruction does generate executable code - as opposed to a Directive, which doesn't. Maybe different assemblers just use different terminology for these things? |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| using memory | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 1) what is the problem 2) as always, the | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not in the "bible"? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| oh well | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 16 limit? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Exactly! It's assembler syntax. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Pseudo Instruction | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Pseudo Instruction? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| "Pseudo-Op" ??? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Blur | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Top marks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
movc | 01/01/70 00:00 |