| ??? 04/19/06 16:32 Read: times |
#114546 - Indeed! Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Erik said:
If that is the case, could you advertise the safety more in the "introduction" so the fearful would and only the paranoid would not enable the "e-mail gate". I agree, many members here are totally out of reach. Why not having enabled this e-mail gate standardly? I cannot see any bad effect, as long as your e-mail address is hidden. Kai |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| memo to Craig (and others) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Indeed! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Spam weary | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SPAM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| my assumptrion confirmed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
10:1 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Abuse? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Some still do so... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| examples of use, not abuse | 01/01/70 00:00 |