| ??? 03/01/06 21:39 Read: times |
#111016 - Low cost Responding to: ???'s previous message |
M Chitrakar said:
and I heard that they (FPGA manuf) are developing low cost boards or is it a single chip? then. "low" is relative - "low cost" doubly so! What an FPGA manufacturer considers "low cost" in FPGA terms is unlikely to bear very much relation at all to what a microcontroller manufacturer considers "low cost" in microcontroller terms - especially when we're talking small, 8-bitters! It's like the Java promoters who consider that a run-time code overhead of "only" 50K is "small"...!! :-0 |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| FPGA/CPLD | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| differences | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SRAM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| you don't | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Security | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
FPGA's were MMI's also ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| copying | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re: comparison | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Incorrect? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No, however... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| about FPGA in 8052? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| In a way yes. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| i heard | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Low cost | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| FPGA vs microcontroller | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not necessarily | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You know it makes sense! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| yeah well | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Xilinx stuff | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Flash based | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Basic logic elements differ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It seems... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Consensus | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| practical consequence | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Jan, Try reading this post | 01/01/70 00:00 |