| ??? 10/26/05 18:34 Read: times |
#102982 - addendum Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Conductivity would probably be a way; however I an 99.17% sure that using conductivity would require calibration based on soil type. That said, if calibration is required, so be it; however i would just luvve it if there was a method that was independent of soil type.
Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| soil dampness | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Conductivity? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Conductivity | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| addendum | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Nutsy idea? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Configuration/calibration | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| that would not be calibration | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| humidity | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Water for a short while and compare | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Another idea | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Spatially Distributed Soil Measurements | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I needed that | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| There is Yet Hope | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| soil dampness | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Gypsum block sensor | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Capacitance. | 01/01/70 00:00 |