| ??? 08/16/05 17:41 Read: times |
#99520 - Everybody is saying to use a table Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Mike Collins said:
I may have mistated what I intended by code optimization.
I'd like to be able to do away with the whole sequence of CJNE and MOV DPTR,#ch??? steps. All four responses have interpreted your intention correctly -- two of mine, Oleg for one, and Peter for one. Everybody is telling you to replace the sequence of CJNEs with a table. I don't understand what the confusion is. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Code optimization suggestion? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Table | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Table? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Another table ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| CJNE | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Everybody is saying to use a table | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| My confsion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| two tables | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Tables | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sure | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| gurus don't subtract constants | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 16 bit table | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| bit table | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Table indexing | 01/01/70 00:00 |