| ??? 06/19/05 07:35 Read: times |
#95292 - Yes, and what have we gained? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Shivani, it is of little use getting annoyed at us concentrating on the program flow. You have shown us faulty code and not answered any of the questions I posed earlier. I would suggest you ask a better question and you may get a better answer. I asked my magic 8 ball if this code would work - its response was 'not likely'. We cannot read your mind! |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| interrupt problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The code doesn't seem to do much | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Reti? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| are you ok | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RETI & CALL | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The CPU performs an implicit call | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SORRY! i was wrong. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No loop or no jump around isr_timer1 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Is it need to set P3.2 if v use ext,intr | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| read all about it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No "main loop" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re:code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re: code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes, and what have we gained? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Superman | 01/01/70 00:00 |