| ??? 06/14/05 05:08 Read: times |
#94841 - I don't know Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Thosw data are given as "digital supply" so they don't include the consumption of the - extensive - analog circuitry. But - yes - it's impressive. I'm still wondering, why is the "static" consumption of "ordinary" '51 so high... (Oh yes, and why SiLabs resist producing ORDINARY '51, if they are so good...?) Jan Waclawek |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Minimizing port pin currents | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Old threas | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thread Vs Reply | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What would be good | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| for me it does | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re: for me it does | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No worry... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Sorry, I misinterpreted Musharraf | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| low power | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| TI ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Total agree | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| low power MCUs | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| App notes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Any link for low power appnote? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Damn all | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| static current? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| very low frequencies | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| it's not just CMOS | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Biasing generator for the substrate? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| flash? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| consumption overview | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SiLabs Wins Then? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I don't know | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Do worry! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| High impedance | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Battery powered circuits | 01/01/70 00:00 |