| ??? 04/17/05 17:59 Read: times |
#91782 - I gave a schematic not PCB layout Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Oh I see. You thought that I made a PCB layout. HaHa
When you say that you never permit joins like my 2nd example are you saying that this is OK...
|
|
-------o-----------o
| |
| |
But this is not?
| |
| |
-------o-----------o----
| |
| |
If so I tend to agree with you. It is desirable to show connections at TEE joints. I was never intending to show that I would be making the cross over type of connection. I was instead trying to determine if you had read my cross overs as connections. When you said that you argued to a different class of marks on an EE exam do you mean that you agrued for and got a better score on the exam? If so please tell us first why the instructor tried to give you a weak score for making a cross over connection. And then tell us what your successful line of reasoning was that led to the "improved" score. Michael Karas |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| SPST switch | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Just a single switch ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes, but... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No worries | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Clear now. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Keypad | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Realisation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| For what it's worth | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| symbol | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| My take is a repeat | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I see what you mean but. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You are missing something... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I gave a schematic not PCB layout | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
clarification | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Inside the ITT Tact Switch | 01/01/70 00:00 |