| ??? 04/06/05 18:16 Read: times |
#91129 - And the point of your post is? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
If you are going to be an ass, at least get the facts straight:
http://www.compuware.com/pressroom...G_HTML.htm http://news.zdnet.com/2100-3513_22-5629876.html Compuware did WIN, (maybe not by a judge's ruling because IBM knew they would lose) and the trial was in its sixth week NOT in the face of a trial. A licensing agreement and purchase offer is a SETTLEMENT, it ends the legal case before a judge/jury decides a verdict. If that's not a settlement, do please explain what is. And there is no eventually may get, the deal is a four year agreement the Compuware executives announced to their shareholders on 3/22/05. Have a nice day! |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| How legal is it?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I was told by a big corp president | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| IPR and Know How | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Wiping off brains | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| as long as... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Depnds | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Skilled Indeed.... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re:legal | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re: NOT legal | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| UK/US | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not totally | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| A case. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Exclusive, or Non-Exclusive | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Consulting | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Court decisions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| IBM vs Compuware | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Won a Settlement??? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| And the point of your post is? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Agreement | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Eh don't worry about it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| engineering ethics | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| well | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| tosser | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Pun | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| IANAL? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| First hit on google gives: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| A tosser is... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Look it up | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Tosser [OT] | 01/01/70 00:00 |