| ??? 04/06/05 06:30 Read: times |
#91082 - thanks smith Responding to: ???'s previous message |
hi
thanks smith for your reply means x will be decalared at ram address multiple of 16 am i right? what why this confusing word boundary is there when ram is sequential,it is not divided like multiple of 8 address(we call it 8byte boundary),multiple of 16 address(we call it 16byte boundary),the boundary word pinching me a lot moreover it says bytes in declaration. thanks kuldeep |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| alignment of variable in c | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Modulo 16 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| thanks smith | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Addressing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not relevant to 8051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re not relevant | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| This subject could be relevant.... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| yeah right | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| External Influences | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Alignment/byte ordering matters a lot! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| you can not align when ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| good references | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RTFM! | 01/01/70 00:00 |