| ??? 03/21/05 14:52 Read: times |
#90118 - SDCC Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Jez Smith said:
... but when someone tells you that sdcc is not a serious compiler you should go and look for yourself youll be amazed and I don't see why I should be the one to keep defending it. I'm trying to use SDCC in a current project and it seems to be working. I haven't compared code efficiency/size to Keil or Raisonance yet, but it does seem that SDCC works fine from a functional perspective. I find the documentation lacking, but I only had stumbled upon the HTML version online at SourceForge. If there's a more complete version in PDF format I'll have to look for that and download it. Regards, Craig Steiner |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| initializing SP to 7FH | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| why? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| To Oleg & Russell | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| To Mehdi | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| To Mehdi | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| why not | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| for example, please | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Oleg, why I do similar | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| here they are | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| well | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| well well | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| well, well - done | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| tight SRAM - use C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
- or assembler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Stack pointer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| external stack | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| why not? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SDCC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re:initializing SP to 7FH | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| very old assemblers only | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Let the assembler do the work! | 01/01/70 00:00 |