| ??? 09/14/11 18:54 Read: times |
#183763 - not fixed yet Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Andy Peters said:
Apparently, the Actel SoftConsole uses an ancient version of sdcc -- 2.6.3 -- so I wonder if this issue has been addressed in a later version of the compiler? I'll open up a bug in the system regardless; it can always be marked as already solved. I can assure you this is not fixed in any recent version as I checked the source code. Andy Peters said:
Now to ask Actel why they use an ancient version of sdcc, and whether I can blithely install a newer one over their installation without the whole thing going to hell. I would wonder especially why they chose to distribute an intermediate snapshot instead of an official release. Maarten Brock SDCC developer |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| SDCC: function pointers in an ISR | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Alternative | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re: Alternative | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Register bank 1 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re: register bank 1 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Using... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Lack of orthogonality | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| incorrect warning | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re: incorrect warning | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not fixed yet | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re: not fixed yet | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Actel's answer. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| warning | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| function pointers in SDCC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| bug fixed! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Actel support | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Still on the payroll | 01/01/70 00:00 |