| ??? 08/29/11 07:00 Read: times |
#183511 - At least 1 packet less (sic) Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Praveen Kumar said:
At least 1 packet less What does this mean? Well, strictly, it should be, "1 packet fewer". But it means exactly what it says: your method uses more packets that necessary; the suggested alternative uses fewer packets - fewer by at least one! |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Multiprocessor Communication 8052 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| where is bottleneck? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| That's the usual approach | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| one comment | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 9th Bit - How ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| how to use bit 9 for data bytes? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| one form of 9th bit use | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| One byte | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| One Byte !!! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re: 1 byte - MDB | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Strong work | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Just as there is a timeout | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| my reason | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Protocol should preferably support dry-counting for EOP pos | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Methods in brief | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| At least 1 packet less (sic) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Neither! | 01/01/70 00:00 |