| ??? 03/09/11 12:17 Read: times |
#181504 - Optimal implementation Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Oliver Sedlacek said:
The compiler vendor should have chosen an optimal implementation. But how do you define "optimal" ? As this thread shows, the 8051's bit type has features that make it good for some things, and not good for others. For a general "bool" type, the compiler would have to choose something that'll work in all cases - which probably precludes the bit type...? |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| bit type function parameter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Look at instruction set | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What is your actual problem here? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| main concern is code operation. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| parameter converted to global variable | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No reentrancy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Is it the 8051 instruction set? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Still looked at the bit capabilities of the processor? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You need to ask Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Use bool to simplify | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| BOOLEAN directive used | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| stdbool | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Use stdbool | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Optimal implementation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SDCC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Optimal for what? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
both | 01/01/70 00:00 |