| ??? 12/10/08 12:34 Read: times |
#160822 - 'polling' is NOT "standard C" Responding to: ???'s previous message |
As I said, we were using non-polling method before, and we wanted to use standard C functions for serial port only for menu since polling is fine for the menu.
'polling' is NOT "standard C" it is a "convenince routine" provided by the Compiler manufacturer Since the menu part is quite extensive for byte by byte handling of ISR, we thought it wise to go for polling. the "exstent" is not a determinator for ISR/poll, I would state that the more extensive, the more importns interrupt driven becomes. In fact, we continued with normal coding after shifting one structure to 03H !! Before that, it was normally declared so that Keil could place it where it wanted. But after moving it to 03H, the code was actually working that is not "the code was actually working" but "the code just happened to work, although faulty" Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Program hangs at one point - 8051F340 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Assembly window | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| hyper terminal interface | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Stack size? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Stack size | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Stack Management | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Watchdog | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| stack and preview.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Limited stack | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Where is the UART ISR? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ISR for UART | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ISR for UART? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| why "TI0=1;" is required | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No, it isn't | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Solved - I guess | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 'polling' is NOT "standard C" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You are right Erik.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thought I will thank you individually.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Disable watchdog | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| and in Keil it is: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Status : WDT disabling in the status worked | 01/01/70 00:00 |