| ??? 11/17/08 19:42 Read: times |
#160095 - coders should think twice Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Per Westermark said:
coders should think twice about designing new code with the non-compliant constructs. I recommend not to use extensions directly at all; always "encapsulate" them is some kind of preprocessor or similar definition - this makes porting so much easier...! |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| SDCC declaring SFR bits | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Manual | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SDCC declaring SFR bits | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Header files? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Header files? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The manual is not enough! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| This is one way | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| That's not what the manual says | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Those SFR definitions are working | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Need someone who knows SDCC: Maarten Brock? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| variant syntax of SDCC keywords and ANSI-C compatibility | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| C standard compliance | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Common for all compilers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| coders should think twice | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The preprocessor is often a good friend | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Suggestion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
thanks, but... | 01/01/70 00:00 |