??? 04/08/08 19:46 Read: times |
#153041 - the problem with spellcheckers is ... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
.... that if your misspelling is a valid word the spellchecker does not burp and you say to yourself "it passed the spellchecker" and send the misspelled epos off.
Re Lynn's friends spellcheck on 'MOV' that would never catch a 'MOV' that should be an 'ANL' Erik PS I know that I should not comment on misspelling due to my "thumb typing", but the above is valid. |
Topic | Author | Date |
Spell check using Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
What ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
What exactly are you spell checking for? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Well... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Danger of spell checking | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
wow that's interesting | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Oops! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Oh ... for the good old days ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Another Oops! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
True enough ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
not the case for me | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Where spell-checking could be useful | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I agree entirely... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
the problem with spellcheckers is ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Spellcheckeritis | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
sure, I do it all te time .... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
We all screw up from time to time, but ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Useful spell checking | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
be creative! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
To be fair... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thanks![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |