| ??? 01/28/08 13:25 Read: times |
#150005 - re SILabs Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Tried to download and run the SiLabs thing, it was an outrageous 7MB installer to install 15MB directly into the root without asking; but those 15MB can be packed by a stupid zip into 4MB... I know, I know, "broadband" and "who cares" are the keywords of today, but where's the engineer/programmer prudence? :->
a) why 'tried'? b) I have the impression that the SILabs toolmakers are a few fries short of a happy meal, I guess that is the reason for the enormous size (what is the size of 'code' generated by a "GUI generator"). When communicating with SILabs, I (when I forget) get a reply "sorry our server will not let us have .zip files" so that is, probably, the reason it is not zipped. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Weekend question: What repeats frequently on '51? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Tools in Assem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Repeated tasks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| mSec Clock Tick, off a timer interrupt | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| CodeArchitect | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| C runtime initializer tool | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Generate Skeleton C code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| biggest problem vs. nightmare | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| i think oranges and apples | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| it's the other way round | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re SILabs | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| done | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a general note on stuff like this | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| you missed the point | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| misunderstanding squared | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| of course it does ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Too much like hard work | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a most hnorable 'like' | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| OOPS a doublr | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| hard work | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Assembly programmers not the worst | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Another Example | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| neighbours | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Code Architect | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
options are good | 01/01/70 00:00 |