| ??? 10/29/07 13:45 Read: times |
#146345 - Different options Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Others have covered the basic ideas of getting more UARTs, but does it have to be RS232 to the two "slaves"?
If not, you could use the 9-bit multiprocessor mode to control both slaves from a single UART. Or you could make an I2C-like interface. Or, if the two slaves don't need to be permanently connected, you could switch a single UART between them |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Tripple UART | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| External UARTs ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| software UART | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Different options | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| much of this follows from the fact... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| simplified software UART | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| processing? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| And if this is designed in-house | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Master/slave | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How much control do you have ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| who write/wrote the firmware for the "slave"s? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Raw code by leo lau | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| So why the 3rd 8051? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 3rd 8051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| More info required | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SC16IS752/SC16IS762 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Dual UART with I2C-bus/SPI interface | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Possible tripple UART solution | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the easy way | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What's a LPC?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
LPC - Good question... | 01/01/70 00:00 |