| ??? 10/22/07 14:22 Read: times |
#146010 - Assumption Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Erik Malund said:
b) your baudrate will be severely limited since you are relying on a rsistive pullup of a a signal loaded by cable capaitance. He hasn't actually stated what chip he's using - maybe it has (the option of) push-pull drive...? A 'cheap' method allowing a limited baudrate would be to use a buffer chip (e.g. a '126) for TxD and a schmitt (such as 2 HC14s in series for the RxD. Also has the advantage of providing at least some protection for the processor pins against "abuse" on the line... |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| UART Maximum | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Baud rate ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Baud | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RS232? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 100m on 4800 BPS | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| true RS232 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| you do not say how | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a) ----- option only | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Twisted Pair | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| He would not be THAT ignorant, I hope | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a much better idea | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Assumption | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a much better idea | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| WRONG | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| panacea ---> The Godess of all cure :) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| of course, you need to connect gnd | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ground problem isnt a problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Call a spade a spade... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| no, it is not | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Differential | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| no, it is not | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Oh yes it is! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| since you control both ends ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Minimum RS422/485 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| mimum length for 485/422 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thanks for the input to all | 01/01/70 00:00 |