??? 02/10/06 20:33 Read: times |
#109747 - now I got curious Responding to: ???'s previous message |
You all know I am Cignorant... so I got curious: I thought that the proper way is to write in C an the critical parts in asm; now you tell me its nont advisable? How is it to be done properly, then? JW |
Topic | Author | Date |
P89V51 ISP | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
example in asm | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
must be in asm | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
C? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
not advisable with Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
now I got curious | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
what is not advisable | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
details? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
pseudo-C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I hope not, that would be the ultimate r | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
the linker does not care if a module is | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
no stack | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I do not know if that makes any sense | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thanks Jan - P89V51RDA2 IAP | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
yes, that is working | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
P89V51 IAP | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
examples![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |