??? 01/09/06 16:41 Read: times |
#106897 - thanks Robert and the crossposting resul Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Jon Wards reply at my crossposting
You could adjust the bit area up in memory (rather than from 20-2f) to 2A-2F. That would make the gap grow by 10 more bytes. The linker could then fit a a larger segment into the gap. a VERY cumbersome workaround, it would "blow up in your face when you added a few variables that happened to go in the segment that you made room for by moving the bit data up. My reply I rallly think this is an issue Keil should consider "fixing" since DATA space is the most precious commodity in the '51. For now I'll stick with the workaround I found of declaring some "well known and stable" DATA variables in a separate segment in assembler. Erik |
Topic | Author | Date |
Keil is down, but I would probably have | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
_at_ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
_at_ for DATA ??? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
yup. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
thanks Robert and the crossposting resul![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |