Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
01/09/06 16:41
Read: times


 
#106897 - thanks Robert and the crossposting resul
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Jon Wards reply at my crossposting
You could adjust the bit area up in memory (rather than from 20-2f) to 2A-2F. That would make the gap grow by 10 more bytes. The linker could then fit a a larger segment into the gap.
a VERY cumbersome workaround, it would "blow up in your face when you added a few variables that happened to go in the segment that you made room for by moving the bit data up.


My reply
I rallly think this is an issue Keil should consider "fixing" since DATA space is the most precious commodity in the '51.

For now I'll stick with the workaround I found of declaring some "well known and stable" DATA variables in a separate segment in assembler.

Erik

List of 5 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Keil is down, but I would probably have            01/01/70 00:00      
   _at_            01/01/70 00:00      
      _at_ for DATA ???            01/01/70 00:00      
         yup.            01/01/70 00:00      
            thanks Robert and the crossposting resul            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List