| ??? 12/31/05 20:00 Read: times |
#106302 - Indeed Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Dan Henry said:
Ian Bell said:
For transmission a UART is perfectly OK. Except that its start and stop bit generation are not compatible with bandwidth-efficient codes (e.g., 4B/5B). Agreed. I never said it was perfect, just possible. Ian |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| interfacing with RF modules | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| So what's the question... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| i have bought rf modules | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| before buying | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RF modules | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RF Module. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| but which data format it will support | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Format. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| no its not like that | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RF Module Code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Nice website | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why not? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Because! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ah but.... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| DC-balanced UART | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RX Only | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| And for Tx... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Indeed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Maybe like this? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I keep my nose out of this (all wireless | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| imbalance | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| i got the way how to use them | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
connect directly | 01/01/70 00:00 |