| ??? 12/07/05 13:16 Read: times |
#104816 - This, of course blows any modern design Responding to: ???'s previous message |
First, the controller must have the program (at least the critical part) externally placed, and so addressed by P0-P2
This, of course blows any modern design. In my opinion the most significant improvement to the '51 ever is the internal flash and ERAM. This makes the '51 a manypin device where, in the olden days, there never were enough pins and CPLDs, latches and whatever had to be added to get enough I/O. A board with a '51, a 232 and a few buffer chips is a beauty to behold when you have seen the old ones with latches, ROM, RAM, CPLD, and who knows what. Slobodan, what you suggest is fine, just kills 99% of all projects. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| how to debug without an ICE? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| possible, sure, as easy no | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| printouts-simulator-monitor-quasiICE-ICE | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Roll your own? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 01/01/70 00:00 | ||
| That's what I do | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Me too | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not pantyhose | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| microscope and nuts | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| other tools | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| A nice self-made tool ! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| This, of course blows any modern design | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What are we talking about ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It DOES have to do with what you suggest | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| another low-cost tool | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The LED | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| digital line with OSCOPE | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| seems print is a very good choice for me | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Make your own | 01/01/70 00:00 |