| ??? 12/02/05 14:21 Read: times |
#104588 - ICE and optimization Responding to: ???'s previous message |
This could possibly reduce your code size to below 64K - although it would be more difficult to debug (even with an ICE).
my experience: "although it would be virtually impossible to debug (even with an ICE)" Re code size reduction: I have learned that thai can be accomplished to a very large extent by "helping" the compiler. an example, albeit small, that I see very often: if (variable == TRUE)
{
variable = FALSE;
}
why not just
variable = FALSE;which is both more compact and faster.
Sometimes it really pays to check 2 versions of the same code e.g. "do while" and "for" can be used interchangeably in most cases, and have a look at the generated assembler. Then jot down in your DNA computer which to use. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| In-circuit emulator | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| emulator or debugger | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| delicate??? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re Phyton | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I think you need some expensive version | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ceibo supports code banking | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| are yoy using the DS ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes it is a DS-51 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What's an emulator ( ICE)? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a simple definition | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Reduce code size? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ICE and optimization | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Good Point | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Optimisation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re: ICE | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I can not speak for you, but evaluating | 01/01/70 00:00 |



