| ??? 10/06/05 12:18 Read: times |
#102026 - since when? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
That would lead to the 18.432MHz as Oleg said (with maximum* of 19200 baud).
since when? have you not heard of using T2? http://www.keil.com/c51/baudrate.asp show 115.2 at 0% error Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Other crystals? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| my experience | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| dallas | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RTFM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the speedy '450 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| why 8MHz? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| crystals | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| '420 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| errata? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 22.1184MHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| since when? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the tiny asterisk... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Baud rates | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| crystals, but problem fixed.... sorta :) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 10472 baud | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| but Atmel | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 8 bits autobaud | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| explanation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| dallas | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 7.3728MHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Lower clock frquency | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| backslashes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| New Server Problems? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| lol | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Go on laughing... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| rise/fall time? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| that is absolutely correct, but what mak | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| jetplanes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It's a combination of both | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| thread | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
This is for the XA which has a UART that | 01/01/70 00:00 |