| ??? 09/27/05 12:15 Read: times |
#101606 - "investing in an ICE" Responding to: ???'s previous message |
By the way: Why invest in an ICE when it is built into the controller?? :-)
nobody suggest that for SILabs chips (BTW none exist AFAIK). The problem is that what SILabs does is NOT "In Circuit Emulation" and calling it a "debugger" is way too non-descriptive. Thus naming the SILabs "debugger" is quite a quandry and maybe some of those attempts make you think a suggestion of purchasing an ICE has been made. If, however, what you mean is "why invest in an ICE for other chips when SILabs has the built-in functionality" I disagree. The choice of processor should not be based on whether a debug functionality is built in. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Silab IDE Problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Cross-post | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Linker? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Silab IDE Problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Silab IDE Problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| OBJECTEXTEND | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Silab IDE Problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Silabs does not support anything | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| debugger - OBJECTEXTEND?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| yes, it does, in the usual stupid way | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Silab IDE Problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Silab IDE Problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| New features...? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| That's what I do | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Silab IDE Problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Linker Listing File | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Silab IDE Problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Clue !! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why you think so ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Diagramatically (warning - widescreen!) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Good diagram | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Locator | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Works perfect at my place! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| "investing in an ICE" | 01/01/70 00:00 |