| ??? 08/26/05 11:43 Read: times |
#100135 - update Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Vignesh Prasad said:
Dear Andy, I have stripped off the remaining portions and have put the simplified version of my serial handling routine and corresponding screen shot of Keil C51 simulator. I said:
The code you are simulating is not the same as the code you are running on your target! Not just slightly different, but significantly different! See: http://www.8052.com/forum/read.phtml?id=100134 Thus rendering the simulation entirely pointless! |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| More encounters with Keil C51 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Simulate it! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It is not an homework | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Proving nothing. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| LCD | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Simulation Results | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Pointless | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Got it !! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| update | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| do you set SCON as a byte or bitwise ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not an answer, but why do you call a fun | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I don't C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| inline | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Compiler Tries | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| OT: inline, Keil ARM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
C99 does specify inline as a keyword. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Review index boundary value | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Even More Pointless simulation! | 01/01/70 00:00 |